Hawks v. Oilers: Khabby’s MIA and Bickell Rings His Own Bell
The most consistent thing about last night’s 5-2 win over the Oilers was the inconsistency of the officiating. Beyond all the missed hooking calls that were so numerous I lost count, there were a couple of missed boarding calls (i.e. dirty hits from behind). The weird thing is the refs didn’t allow any fights. So, in theory, the refs would allow dirty hits which had the potential to do damage, but they wouldn’t allow fighting ostensibly because fighting leads to injuries? Yeah, that makes sense.
Also how many interference calls were missed? I think I counted two times when I looked up and one of the Oil was holding a Hawk against the boards. Those are pretty obvious penalties to miss, if in fact you’re just missing them and not, say, overlooking them altogether.
And in terms of overlooking things, it’s really too bad that Bryan Bickell overlooked his own safety while open-ice checking Oiler Dustin Penner which resulted in Bickell slamming his head on the ice after tripping over Penner. It’s never a good sign when two of your own teammates (in this case Niklas Hjalmarsson and Troy Brouwer) have to help you off the ice. Bickell got his bell rung but good and is certain to have a substantial concussion. I hope that the Hawks management will remember how Bickell took one for the team and ask him back up when he stops seeing double (or triple or quadruple).
Ok that was the bad, now for the good stuff. How much of a nail-biter was it when Cristobal Huet made that awesome save in the 2nd period by coming out of the crease so far he was halfway to the blue line! At the same time you have to cringe because of course you never want to see your goalie that far out. Yikes! (It was good that Huet was performing so well last night and that Khabibulin was not in net for the Oil because seeing those two go head-to-head just feels really wrong somehow.)
Huet would again star in another nail-biting moment later in the 2nd period. With the clock showing 0.1 seconds left, Oiler Shawn Horcoff supposedly scored a goal. It wasn’t a pretty goal and had it stood it would’ve been called a garbage goal, but the War Room ruled a ‘no goal’ determining time had run out before the puck went in. Once again, Huet had another great night.
Jonathan Toews too had an excellent night. He had two goals — one in the first period and one in the third on a power play — and an assist. (Also to score were Kris Versteeg, Patrick Kane, and John Madden.) Tazer’s forechecking is now back to his pre-injury caliber so it’s nice to have him back all the way. It’s nice to have this team back…finally. Now, if the Hawks can keep up their winning streak on the road, they will make Hawks fans some very happy humans (as Pat Foley would say).
November 22nd, 2009 at 6:29 am
Hmmmm.
And to think that you had doubts about the horrible officiating this year.
So, are you slowly but surely coming to Huet’s fan club? ;)
It seems like you are swaying that way.
You might as well join us, cuz he is our main man, and he needs our support.
Good work Chica! (Chica? What the hell is your name anyways???)
November 22nd, 2009 at 3:33 pm
Seems to me the real problem with the officiating is just how subjective it is. Some refs will allow fighting to go on til there are brains on the ice. Some never allow fighting. And then there are those that allow it but always make it a 5-minute major. Then there are still others who differentiate between roughing and fighting. I just wish that whatever they did they would all do. (As long as they all keep fighting. It’s a fundamental part of the game.)
No, I am not in the Huet fan club as yet. But i will always give someone their props when they’re doing well. My problem has never been with Huet doing poorly (even really poorly). My problem has always been his inconsistency. i think other teams have had this beef with Huet as well. Has he stayed with any team for longer than 2 years? Yes, he’s our guy and of course I support him and I’ll always cheer for him to do well. But I won’t ignore a bad performance either. And yes, I will gladly eat crow on Huet because I would love for him to prove me wrong!
November 22nd, 2009 at 9:54 pm
Isn’t it great that the on-ice officials can be over ruled by the Bat Cave, and vise versa, and this ‘intent to blow’ crap is allowed to pass as a call, good or bad, either way?
I’m gonna hold you to eating that crow you know. ;)
November 22nd, 2009 at 10:03 pm
Standing by with knife and fork!
November 23rd, 2009 at 12:37 am
No no no!
I thought you were from the hood?!
The black chicken gets fried and ate with your hands around here!
November 23rd, 2009 at 1:16 am
I have lived in a hood, but am not from the hood. And you will have to instruct me as I am not used to eating crow. ;)
November 23rd, 2009 at 2:17 am
Oh by the way, if anyone’s wondering what the “intent to blow” rule is (because I was) you can read about it here:
http://nhl.fanhouse.com/2007/04/20/the-intent-to-blow-rule/
November 23rd, 2009 at 12:18 pm
I know what it is, and I have no comment on it at this time…